[Hatem]

That’s a great question Ryan—and one I’ve been reflecting on as well.
With the growing availability of small and micro-scale upgrading technologies, combined with innovations like RNG-powered farm equipment, I believe RNG is becoming increasingly feasible in remote areas. These advancements lower the barriers to entry for decentralized energy production, which is particularly important where traditional infrastructure is limited or costly to extend.

In fact, I’ve had the opportunity to work on several projects in remote regions where being energy autonomous wasn’t just a preference—it was a necessity for the residents. In those settings, RNG played a key role in supporting local resilience. It allowed communities to make use of on-site organic waste, reduce their reliance on diesel or other fossil fuels, and stabilize their energy supply in a more sustainable way.

While CHP systems certainly have their advantages, especially in larger, centralized installations, RNG offers a flexible and scalable alternative. It’s especially promising for farms and smaller communities looking to close local loops and align with environmental goals. As the technology matures and the economics continue to improve, I do see RNG becoming not just a viable option, but a compelling one in many remote and rural contexts.
Thanks 🙂