Biogas upgrading

  • Zoe

    Member
    3 March 2026 at 11:01 am

    Hi Lorenzo,

    From our experience working with people/ companies at every stage of the process, one thing that is pretty clear (IMO) is that there’s no “one size fits all” solution. Each plant is different, and determining what equipment would be best for upgrading will depend on the kind of plant, capacity, region, etc. The good people at @Waga-Energy, @prodeval_raphael , @AB-Group , among others, should be able to give you more specifics depending on your facility.🙂

    Hope that helps!

  • Malek Mezni

    Member
    3 March 2026 at 12:39 pm

    Hi, just adding to what Zoe said, the size, electricity cost, location and various operational constraints can help developers chose the right upgrading technology (PSA, membrane technology, chemical scrubbing, ..)

  • Tejas

    Member
    3 March 2026 at 11:24 pm

    Hi Lorenzo,

    There are wide range of criteria starting from desired gas composition in outlet, methane loss, CAPEX, OPEX, plant availability, maintenance/replacement hours and cost.

    I have prepared excel sheet to compare those,

    https://www.linkedin.com/posts/tejas-chauhan-91894484_biocng-cbg-biogas-activity-7321076701671636992-ZnQ5?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAABHv0CQBQ03tTTA-QaAEv36i8cRUnWux2nM

    • Natalia Bourenane

      Organizer
      4 March 2026 at 7:12 am

      Tejas, thank you for sharing this publication. This is very interesting. Will it be applicable to any territory or is it country specific? @Tejas

      • Tejas

        Member
        4 March 2026 at 10:37 am

        This is applicable to everywhere.

    • Lorenzo

      Member
      4 March 2026 at 7:46 am

      Thank you Tejas for the info!

  • Brad

    Member
    4 March 2026 at 8:54 am

    Hi Lorenzo;

    For several years I sold three of the four upgrading technologies (PSA, membranes, water wash & amine wash), and during that time I did over 600 technology comparisons for RNG developers. I can attest that the criteria for selecting one technology over another needs to be based on which criteria has the biggest impact on life cycle project profitability. In a nutshell that means comparing all four on the basis of:

    1) Performance (Risk of Shut in),

    2) Reliability (Risk of Downtime),

    3) OpEx,

    4) Methane Recovery, and

    5) CapEx

    in that order. I can also attest to the fact that while every project is different, and every technology has it’s niche where it’s the best fit, in my experience, the vast majority of the time PSA will provide the highest life cycle project profitability.

    I disagree with simply reaching out to vendors to ask their opinion, as not surprisingly, each vendor suggests that the best technology is the one they sell. You need a neutral third party to do the comparison.

    And while your EPC should be your best option for an unbiased technology comparison, they will often have strong preferences based on what they have the most experience with – i.e it’s easier for them to repeat what they did on a previous project that to risk learning a new technology & process. This will often cloud their judgement, keeping you from getting an truly unbiased opinion that is tailored to the specifics of your project.

    • Natalia Bourenane

      Organizer
      4 March 2026 at 10:26 am

      Brad, thank you very much for your reply. It is certain that your experience in US market brings a lot to the table. Are you offering consulting services for projects as part of your current mandate?

      • Brad

        Member
        4 March 2026 at 10:46 am

        Absolutely. With 20+ years in the biogas and RNG industry and a deep background in RNG offtake, business development, project management, investment, acquisitions, O&M, and EPC, I offer a wide range of consulting expertise. Interested parties can find out more at http://www.RNGinsight.com or reach out to me at brad@RNGinsight.com.

        • Natalia Bourenane

          Organizer
          4 March 2026 at 3:55 pm

          Excellent, thank you for confirming your services Brad!

    • Dave

      Member
      4 March 2026 at 10:19 pm

      Well said Brad!

      We are seeing digester owner clients dealing with issues of very poor turn-down on their upgraders, with more than 30% methane loss when operating at low flows. Dramatically poor performance from some upgrading technology as they wrestle with feedstock supply to be able to increase the production of raw biogas!

Log in to reply.